Jevons, Yards. P., and Parker, M. T. (1964). J. din. Path., 17, 243-250. Lidwell, 0. M. (1959). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 18,49-52. Alive, We., and Nichols, A good. C. (1961).J. shoot. Dis.,108, 195-204. Macdonald, A beneficial. (1946). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 5, 230-233. Meyer, W. (1966). Zentbl. Bukt. PurusitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 201,465-481. Meyer, W. (1967). J. Hyg., Camb., 65,439-447. Nakagawa, M. (1960). Jap. J. moist. Res., 8, 331-342. Oeding, P., and you can Williams, R. E. 0. (1958). step three. Hyg., Cumb., 56, 445-454. Pagano, J. S., Farrer, S. Meters., Plotkin, S. A beneficial., Brachman, P. S., Fekety, F. R., and you can Pidcoe, V. (1960). Research, N.Y., 131, 927-928. Parker, Yards. T. (1966). For the “The fresh Scientific Foundation off Treatments Yearly Feedback” (J. P. Ross, ed.), pp. 157-173. University out-of London area, The latest Athlone Push, London area. Parker, Yards. T., Todinson, A. J. H., and you will Williams, R. Elizabeth. 0. (1955). J. Hyg., Cumb., 53,458-473.
The fresh new parasexual stage and its particular include in hereditary investigation
Pether, J. V. S. (1968).J. Hyg., C an effective d . , 66,605. Poole, P. M., and you may Baker, J https://datingranking.net/escort-directory/bakersfield/. R. (1966). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 25, 116-123. Report (1959). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl.,9, 115-118. Statement (1963). Int. Bull. bact. Nomencl., 13, 119-122. Statement (1967). Int. Bull. buct. Nomencl., 17, 113-125. Statement (1971). Int. Bull. syst. Buct., 21, 165, 167, 171. Rountree, P. Meters. (1959). J. gen. Microbiol., 20,620-633. Rountree, P. M., and you will Asheshov, Age. H. (1961). J. gen. Microbiol., 26, 111-122. Rountree, P. M., and Freeman, B. Yards. (1955). Med. J. Aust., dos, 157-161. Ruys, A. C., and you can Borst, J. (1959). Antonie wan Leeuwenhoek, twenty five, 237-240. Seto, J. T., and you can Wilson, J. B. (1958). Was.3. moist. Res., 19, 241-246. Smith, H. W. (1948a).J. Hyg., C u d . , 46,7681. Smith, H. W. (1948b);Jp. Road. Ther., 58, 179-188. Smith, H. W. (1954).J. Street. Buc
Tarr, H. An excellent. (1958). Mon. Bull. Minist. Hlth., 17, 64-72. A beneficial. (1965). Veterinarian. Rec., 77, 477-480. Wentworth, B., Romig, W. R., and Dixon, W. J. (1964). J. infect. Dis.,114, 179188.
Williams, Roentgen. Elizabeth. 0. (1957). Zentbl. Bakt. PurasitKde., I . Abt. Orig., 168, 528-532. Williams, R. Elizabeth. O., and you will Jevons, M. P. (1961). Zentbl. Bukt. ParasitKde., I Abt. Orig., 181,349-358. Williams, Roentgen. E. O., and you may Rippon, J. Age. (1952). J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 320-353. Williams, R. Age. O., Rippon, J. E., and you may Dowsett, L. M. (1953). Lancet, we, 510-514. Wilson, Grams. S., and you will Atkinson, J. D. (1945). Lancet, we, 647-649.
Hereditary Analysis in the Micro-organisms DAVID A beneficial. HOPWOOD John Znnes Institute, Norwikh, The united kingdomt I. Introduction . 11. Segregation as Evidence of Simple Hereditary Control . Good. New genetic way of biology . B. The latest recognition from segregation . 111. The basis out-of Hereditary Mapping . B. The new sequencing regarding loci to the a great linkage chart: multi-foundation crosses C. Linkagegroups . D. Genetic fine-construction . Age. Removal mapping . IV. Practical Genetic Screening . An effective. Popularity screening . Bplementation tests . C. Epistasis . V. Genetic Investigation inside the Eukaryotic Microorganisms . A beneficial. Standard considerations . 1. 2. Tetrad research . B. Hereditary investigation particularly bacteria step 1. Aspergillus nidulans . . 2. Aspergillus niger or other “imperfect” fungus 3. Neurospora crassa . cuatro. Almost every other ascomycetes . 5. Yeasts . 6. Filamentous basidiomycetes . 7. Ustilago . 8. Chlamydomonas reinhardii . 9. Ciliates . ten. Slime moulds VI. Genetic Studies for the Prokaryotes . An excellent. Standard factors . 1. Virility sizes and conjugational mapping . 2. Transduction and you will co-transduction . step three. Sales and you will co-conversion cuatro. Non-selective research .
fifty 51 57 61 61 65 66 69 69 73 75 77 78 80 81 81 83 84 91 94
Watson, W
Genetic investigation in particular organisms 1. Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium or any other Enteric germs . dos. Pseudomonas aeruginosa and you will Ps. putida . 3. Bacillus subtilis 4. Streptmyces coelicolor and other actinomycetes . 5. Most other bacterium C. Certified mapping measures separate away from recombination VII. Hereditary Study when you look at the Worms A beneficial. Standard considerations . step 1. Types of viral genomes dos. Bells and whistles of trojan genetics B. Hereditary research specifically viruses step one. Bacteriophages dos. Creature worms 3. Plant viruses VIII. Concluding Opinions References .
